Without rhythm, every instrument would not have the same
point of change. For instance if their was not a rhythmic structure in a song,
the guitar could play the song in the time signature of 3/4 and the drums and
bass could play in 4/4 time. The two time signatures conflict because there are
3 beats per measure in 3/4 time and 4 beats per measure in 4/4. The timing
would be off because the beats do not line up with each other, making it hard
to follow where the bridge,chorus,prechorus, and verses would be in a song.
Melody is important, but many bands have played songs out of tune and with
random cords. For example, The Beatles wrote a song called "Helter
skelter", where the bass and guitar were both out of tune and did not
sound right to the ear. That was how they wrote the song though. Also, many
chants and tribal songs consisted of only drums. So, drums, keeping the rhythm
of the piece and the time signature, would not need to have a certain melody.
Rhythm is also important for how slow or fast a song is. For very dramatic, sad
songs, a slower rhythm can be used to show intensity and passion. Also, slower
rhythms are often used in operas or ballads. This is useful for the singer to
hold longer notes for longer periods of time. Faster rhythms can be used for
types of music such as metal(favorite) alternative rock, techno, and other
types of music that you can dance to. Although, slower rhythms can be used for
slower dances such as walts or other proper dancing. Over all, if music did not
have rhythm, we would not have the part of the song that can make the same
chords and notes from one song, into an entirely new song.
2 comments:
Good job by staying on the same area of the one topic.
I liked the way you used the idea of time in your post. I really didn't see it that way when I was writing. But after reading your post I would have to say I do agree with you.
Post a Comment