Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Sex is not a required element
In
my opinion, I do not think sex is a required element in order to sell music,
movies, theatre, or other artistic endeavours . However, I do think it is much
more acceptable than it was a generation or two ago and it is definitely used
more than it used to be. There are some genres of music, movies, and theatre
where there is a lot of sexual content, and they are successful, but I do not
believe the use of sex is what necessarily makes it popular. On the other hand,
there is also a lot of genres that rarely have any sexual content, and it is still
just as successful. People want to listen to or watch things that will be
interesting to them, for example sports, family, love, comedy or music in
general. None of these need sex as an element to make it popular because people
will be drawn to it for the bigger picture. As I said before, the element of
sex is, however, more acceptable now that it was before. Before, actually, it
was rather uncommon to have sex as an element in music, movies, and other
artistic endeavours. This backs up my
view that sex isn’t a required element, because those artistic endeavours still
managed to keep people interested and be very successful. But like I said before, sex is a lot more
acceptable in today’s society. There are artists like Rihanna and Lady Gaga who
often have a lot of sexual material in their songs which are extremely popular,
but on the other hand there’s artists like Taylor Swift who often sings about
love, but never includes sexual content, and she is just as popular.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
True. Todays world seems to except more sexual content than in previous years. It is a true shame. Good blog.
I really agree with your blog. I found it really hard to think of things that were successful and not sexual, and Taylor Swift was a great example! It is sad to me that it is so hard to think of art today without sex.
Post a Comment